A daily menu built from the food you already eat.
They assume you cook every night, that your training happens at the same hour, that nobody else in the house has an opinion about dinner, and that you'll never eat at a drive-through again.
Then a week goes sideways. You break the rule once, decide you've failed, and stop. The problem was the plan, which was never built for you in the first place.
This works the other way around. It starts from what you already eat and changes as little as possible, because the smallest change that actually holds beats the perfect plan you abandon in March.
The questionnaire does the work. The honesty is the only thing asked of you.
Including the takeout, the late-night cereal and the Friday drinks. An honest answer produces a menu you're still following in six months. A tidied-up one produces a menu that belongs to someone else.
When you train, what your job asks of your body, how you sleep, any conditions or medications, what's actually in your kitchen, and what time you can realistically eat. These decide how the day is split and where each meal sits, before a single food is chosen.
Every course offers several options, most of them things you already make. What changes is usually smaller than people expect: a portion, an addition, a swap.
There's room built in for the week that goes wrong, because that week is coming.
How long does the questionnaire actually take?
Twenty to thirty minutes if you take it seriously, and there's no need to finish it in one sitting. A good deal of it is checkboxes and dropdowns, which move quickly. One question asks you to write out a real day of eating, meal by meal, and that one is worth slowing down for. It's where most of the menu comes from.
Leave anything blank that you don't know. Unknown is more useful than guessed. If you're estimating, say so.
Why does it ask about medications and medical conditions?
Because they change the shape of a menu more than anything else on the form. Conditions decide not only what goes on the menu but when, and which foods need keeping apart from each other.
Iron, thyroid medication and calcium all compete with food and with each other, so the timing of a dose can move an entire meal. On one menu built this year, separating breakfast from coffee and dairy by an hour did more than any food swap on the page.
What if I don't cook, or barely cook?
The form asks who does the cooking, how much time you have on a weeknight, whether you batch or cook fresh, how confident you are in a kitchen, how many meals a week you eat out, and what equipment you actually have. If there's no oven, nothing on your menu will need one.
If you have twenty minutes on a Tuesday, nothing on your menu will take forty-five. If you eat out twice a week, those two meals get costed and listed like any other, rather than treated as a failure.
Do I have to weigh or track anything?
No. Some menus use rough weights as reference points to eyeball against. Others use hand sizes instead: a palm of protein, a fist of vegetables, a cupped hand of starch, a thumb of fat. Your hand is proportional to you, travels everywhere and needs no cupboard space.
Which one you get depends on what you say you want. Nothing here needs logging.
Why does it ask what a bad week looks like?
Because one is coming, and a menu that only works in a good week isn't much use. The form asks what usually derails you, what changes about how you eat when it does, and what would actually help.
Some people need fewer decisions. Some need something in the freezer. Some need permission to eat the same thing three nights running. That answer shapes what gets built for those weeks, rather than leaving you to improvise.
It asks about my relationship with food. Why, and what happens with that?
Because it changes how a menu is built, and occasionally whether one is the right thing at all. If there's a history there, calorie numbers and tracking come off the table entirely and the menu is built on food and timing instead.
There's an option to say you'd rather not answer, and taking it is completely fine. Answering honestly doesn't change whether I'll work with you. There's also space to tell me any language around food or weight you'd rather I didn't use, and I won't use it.
These are drawn from menus already built. Two are described by situation rather than name, because health information belongs to the person it's about.
Two Olympic lifting sessions and two long-drive sessions a week, at a time that shifts anywhere between eleven and four. A fixed meal plan breaks immediately against a schedule like that.
How this menu was built
So the menu was built in two shapes, an early day and a late day, both costed to land in the same place. Whichever meal falls one to two hours before the session becomes the carbohydrate-forward one. Whatever comes next becomes the recovery meal. The rule travels with the session instead of fighting it.
Two road stops a week are costed and listed on the menu like any other meal. Planned for from the start. Nothing gets skipped because a rule was broken.
Coeliac disease, low iron, and fainting episodes that made breakfast non-negotiable. The food itself was only half the problem.
How this menu was built
Three rules ended up carrying the whole plan. No coffee, tea or dairy within an hour of breakfast, because all three cut iron absorption by forty to sixty percent, and breakfast is where the iron lives. Every iron dish gets a vitamin C partner, which can double or triple what actually reaches the bloodstream. And all oats certified gluten free, since standard oats are cross-contaminated at the mill.
The yogurt bowl didn't come off the menu. It moved to ten o'clock, far enough from breakfast that its calcium no longer competes with the iron. Same food, different hour, completely different result.
A target weight and a date roughly a month out. The obvious answer is a sharp deficit. The obvious answer was wrong.
How this menu was built
Rapid fat loss raises uric acid, because the by-products of fast fat breakdown compete with urate for the same route out through the kidneys. A sharp deficit over a few weeks is close to the pattern most likely to trigger a flare. So the menu was built around roughly a pound a week instead.
Steady loss with no flare and strength intact beats chasing a faster number and losing two weeks to an attack. The slower rate was the version that actually reaches the target.
The same bowl, rebuilt, with nothing removed. Taken from a real menu.
A mid-afternoon standby and a pre-workout snack. Filling, quick, and no cooking involved.
Same cereal, same bowl, same two minutes. Protein stirred through and a piece of fruit added.
Three hundred and sixty fewer calories, five more grams of protein, and something on the plate that wasn't refined carbohydrate. Nothing was banned and nothing was replaced with a food he doesn't like. That's the shape of nearly every change on these menus.
What do the rest of the changes usually look like?
Smaller than people expect. A portion adjusted rather than a food removed. Something added to a meal that was already fine but incomplete. A meal moved by an hour or two so it stops competing with something else.
On one menu the biggest single change was frozen vegetables instead of fresh, because the client avoided vegetables entirely on the grounds of preparation time and avoided fruit because it spoiled. No washing, no chopping, no waste, four minutes in a steam bag. That one change unlocked most of the menu.
Does anything get taken away?
Rarely, and only where a real health reason makes it worth it, in which case the menu explains why rather than just instructing you.
On one menu built around a condition where food genuinely matters, nothing came off. The favourite dinner stayed dinner, the takeout stayed twice a week, the cereal stayed breakfast and the weekend drinks stayed. What changed is that vegetables became easy, the mornings got heavier, and the weight came off at a rate the condition could live with.
What if I genuinely don't like a food you suggest?
Then it shouldn't be on there. The form asks what you won't eat and whether that is taste, texture or principle, along with which vegetables you'll actually eat and which protein sources you've gone off.
Every course offers several options rather than one instruction, so there's always something you can pick on a day when you can't face the rest.
Worth saying plainly, because it decides whether this is the right thing for you.
It's a guideline built from your own habits. Follow it near enough and it works. There's no failing at it.
I'm a personal trainer, not a dietitian or a doctor. If you're managing diabetes, blood pressure, kidney disease, a medication that interacts with food, or a history of disordered eating, work with your physician or a registered dietitian. A menu can support that. It can't replace it.
Where a condition needs medical treatment, the menu says so. One of the menus above tells the client outright that diet moves the underlying marker by perhaps ten to fifteen percent, that medication moves it far more, and that they should ask their doctor about it.
The questionnaire opens with this rather than burying it. The first questions you see are about exactly these situations, before anything about weight or food is asked.
Answer as honestly as you can, leave blank anything you don't know, and take your time on the question that asks you to write out a real day of eating. That one is where the menu comes from.
START THE QUESTIONNAIRE →
